Editorial Policy & Ethics

All manuscripts submitted to World Academic Press undergo a double-blind peer review process. This ensures that both the reviewers and authors remain anonymous to each other, fostering an unbiased evaluation.

1. Initial Screening: The editorial team checks the manuscript for scope, formatting, and plagiarism.
2. Reviewer Assignment: Two or more independent experts in the field are invited to review the work.
3. Evaluation: Reviewers assess originality, methodology, clarity, and contribution to the field.
4. Decision: The Editor-in-Chief makes a final decision based on reviewer reports (Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject).

We adhere to the rigorous guidelines set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

• Plagiarism

  Zero tolerance for plagiarism. All submissions are screened using Turnitin/iThenticate.

• Data Fabrication

  Authors must ensure all data is accurate and reproducible. Fabrication leads to immediate rejection.

• Conflict of Interest

  Authors, reviewers, and editors must declare any potential conflicts of interest.

• Authorship

  Only those who made significant contributions should be listed as authors.

World Academic Press publishes under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). This means:

• Authors retain copyright of their work.
• Readers are free to share, copy, and redistribute the material.
• Proper attribution must be given to the original author and source.